Marketing

Advertisers: Tell us how you’ll add value to our lives

November 20th, 2009 by Andrew Swenson in Marketing

compareA couple iPhone snaps from Methodist Hospital in Omaha

We talk a lot about using relevant stories to earn trust in as we move into a new “human business” ethic. If companies are going to build trust by acting like humans online, I think they should act like humans in their ads and in their traditional marketing stories too.

A quick example

In honor of the Great American Smokeout on November 19, Methodist Hospital in Omaha put up a number of “I Quit” posters to inspire smokers to quit, if only for just one day.

If you look at the two posters above, I can bet which one you connect with more—the one with the person on it.

The fact of the matter is, any product or service you attempt to sell is at its core designed to make someone’s life richer or easier (even if you manufacture nails, those nails make a carpenter’s life easier by giving him/her an easy way to fasten boards together).

Since your product is inexplicably tied to humanity, your ads and other traditional marketing communications must also weave into the story of humanity.

Including a human face with a human story is a great way to do that.

Building Trust in Ads through Human Connection

David Spinks recently wrote on thelostjacket.com:

Instead of asking your audience to trust your message, show them what you’re doing to earn it. Create an opportunity to earn that trust and then follow through by living up to the promise.

Simply put, instead of, “Our car is the best quality”, say, “This is why you should trust in our quality”. [Read the rest of the post]

But it’s more than just giving a list of product benefits for why you should trust in quality. Good copywriters have been explaining “why” people should trust your brand for decades. The point is to make sure those “why” elements also explain why benefits matter on a human level (which, I suppose good copywriters have also been doing for a while).

Instead of saying, “You should trust in our quality because we do 1000 quality tests on every new model,” say “We spend time completing 1000 quality tests so you won’t spend time on the side of the road.”

Because at the end of the day, we’ll trust your brand if you prove to us you can add value to our lives.

What do you think? Has marketing communications been trending this way for a while, or has the new impulse to tell stories and build trust accelerated it?

I’d love to know how you see it.

-Andrew


Related Posts

No related posts were found, so here's a consolation prize: A couple of facts about revolutions.

keywords: , , ,

  • http://thelostjacket.com Stuart Foster

    Quick correction on this Andrew: David Spinks of http://davidspinks.com wrote that article as a guest post for The Lost Jacket.

    Just want to make sure he gets the credit! Thanks :)

    • http://wordpost.org Andrew Swenson

      Stuart, my bad for missing that. I've updated the post to give him the credit.

      Thanks for letting me know.

  • abbyannette

    I had a revelation yesterday, well kinda. I believe that advertisers' jobs are most often just to make us curious. And if we are curious enough, we might just buy the product. Granted that is not always the case by any means.

    • http://wordpost.org Andrew Swenson

      You bring up a valid point. Maybe it's not at all about value. Maybe it's about curiosity.

      Or both?

      Or maybe my sense of MarCom is going crazy and I've overthought this.

      I've also been thinking a lot about a presentation I heard at #140conf in LA.

      Mad Man Hank Wasiak ( http://twitter.com/hankwasiak ) suggested that the AIDA (attention, interest, desire, action) test for determining the value of ads needs to be augmented with Engagement (has in relational) and Shareability. He suggested that the new model, and the new purpose of ads could be summed up with A+IDEAS (AIDA + Engagement and Shareability).

      Since Wasiak probably forgets more about ads in one day than I'll ever know, maybe that's the way to go…

  • http://wordpost.org Andrew Swenson

    You bring up a valid point. Maybe it's not at all about value. Maybe it's about curiosity.

    Or both?

    Or maybe my sense of MarCom is going crazy and I've overthought this.

    I've also been thinking a lot about a presentation I heard at #140conf in LA.

    Mad Man Hank Wasiak ( http://twitter.com/hankwasiak ) suggested that the AIDA (attention, interest, desire, action) test for determining the value of ads needs to be augmented with Engagement (has in relational) and Shareability. He suggested that the new model, and the new purpose of ads could be summed up with A+IDEAS (AIDA + Engagement and Shareability).

    Since Wasiak probably forgets more about ads in one day than I'll ever know, maybe that's the way to go…

  • http://www.nikemaxsale.com air max shoes

    Well , the view of the passage is totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum!
    aesthetic-appeal

  • http://www.discount-nike-dunk-shoes.com nike dunk sb shoes

    Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion.
    http://www.thegy.net